Análisis Comparativo de la Accesibilidad de Frameworks Front-End, Aplicado al Desarrollo de un Sistema en el Departamento Médico del Centro de Privación de Libertad Riobamba.

Abstract

It was made a comparative analysis of accessibility to frameworks front-end, and with the selected framework to develop a system for the Medical Center Department of Deprivation of Liberty, of Riobamba. To compare, two prototypes with the framework Bootstrap and Foundation; the accessibility web was evaluated by basing of the Guidelines of Foundation; the accessibility for the web content of W3C (WCAG) 2.0, accepted in Ecuador under the norm NTE INEN-ISO/IEC 40500. For evaluating the accessibility was applied an automatic test, the evaluators online were used, an examiner and Access Monitor, a manual test made by means of checking of the accessibility success criteria guidelines WCAG 2.0 of the conformity levels A and AA, and the verification of the accomplishment level with the standard CSS of the evaluated framework. The Obtained outcomes with the application of the test of accessibility determined that the framework Bootstrap was valued with a 75% and the framework Foundation was valued with a 91.66% that is why this tool was catalogued as one that brings the best characteristics to develop web sites with a better accessibility. The system development for the Medical Department was made with the framework Foundation, Java Server Faces, Primefaces and Postgresql, by using the methodology of a speedy development XP and the Model Sight- Controller. It is recommended beginning its usage, which makes more efficient the management of information, and benefits to the employees of the Medical Center of Deprivation of Liberty.